4 posts tagged

Regulations

First world’s ICCO – from Malta with love

The emerging world of blockchain industry had seen different kinds of investment and crowdfunding approaches. The nowadays most popular instrument which is ICO had surely been around for some time and literally rocketed to the moon during the last year, but it’s certainly not the only and top tool to collect money from the investors around the globe.

Malta is known, amongst many other reasons, to be the country which recently applied specific official regulatory measures to make the fundraising for blockchain-based projects fully legislatively regulated within its territory. That implies the first milestone in the industry – the ICCO which stands for Initial Convertible Coin Offering.

The first in the history ICCO was announced by the blockchain company Palladium, and the leading bitcoin-exchange Bittrex – as the first fully regulated environment in Malta.

As stated in the Bittrex press release, the difference between convertible coins is that within three years after the release holders of these coins can at any time change them for shares of Palladium company.

Moreover, Malta is enacting comprehensive blockchain legislation and has a dedicated blockchain unit at the MFSA. This ICCO is one of the unique investment opportunities in the blockchain world. The University of Malta will also offer a special Blockchain degree which will start in October this year.

An ICCO model differs from the now-more-traditional Initial Coin Offering in that investors will be able to convert tokens into company shares at a later date – in Palladium’s case, three years after the sale.

“We expect this project, which will create more than 100 job opportunities, to be a historic landmark and to bridge the gap between traditional financial services and cryptocurrencies,” – founder and chairman Paolo Catalfamo commented. Moreover, he also spoke very positively about Malta, as a country located at the front of blockchain technologies.

The launch of the project was attended by the Prime Minister of Malta Joseph Muscat, Secretary of the Parliament for Digital Innovation and Finance Silvio Schembri, and the head of the Maltese Financial Services Department Joseph Kushiri.

“This ICCO will become one of the largest investment opportunities in the world of the blockchain. Institutional investors understand all the advantages of investing in the cryptocurrency industry, but the lack of regulation discourages them. The decision of Palladium will change this and allow users to use their accounts to manage cryptocurrency and fiat assets in full compliance with regulatory requirements, ‘says Paolo Catalano.

The goal of this particular ICCO is to collect financing of $ 150 million. The official campaign is scheduled for the period from July 25 to September 30, and the prescription of tokens began on Tuesday, July 10.

‘Our cooperation will lead to a new trading platform based on blockbuster technology, and users of this site will have access to many tokens available at Bittrex,’ said Bill Shihara, CEO of Bittrex.

Malta had adopted the new legislative acts governing the cryptocurrency industry only last week. Silvio Schembri noted back then that Malta had become one of the first countries with such official regulation.

No doubt, during the next months we are about to witness if this recent approach would be appreciated by any other countries which try to apply the ICO regulation rules or other legislative measures within their territory.

2018   2018   Blockchain   Crypto currency   Crypto industry   ICCO   Malta   Regulations

USA ICO Regulation

One of the world’s leading countries, the US, has specific issues regarding the ICO startups. As the world startup projects market is developing despite the severe regulation measures in certain countries, United States supports the Initial Coin Offering model of fundraising so far. However, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) often changes the strict regulation rules which need to be applied when conducting ICO.
Simply put, this model is allowed, but is already under heavy legal regulation.

As of Q1 2018 data– most of the ICOs were conducted under the United States jurisdiction – 59 projects totaled about $ 583.8 million.

ICO rules vary widely from state to state – from an absence of regulations at all in some states to the ones present that require deposits in equal to or more than all local transactions. Sometimes, a license for businesses to engage in the cryptocurrency activities is required. On the federal level, no current regulations are banning ICOs specifically, although ICOs are expected to be registered and licensed the same as if they were another fundraising models. This includes registering with the SEC if the ICO is to sell or trade securities. The SEC has recently found that some altcoins may be a security, and as such, may be subject to SEC’s ruling in the future. Some SEC commissioners hold the position that most ICOs are securities and should be treated as such. ICOs are expected to adhere to AML/KYC practices. Failure to adhere to these practices may leave an ICO open to legal action or possible seizure.

The United States has also moved to recognize celebrity endorsements of ICOs to be illegal unless all compensation involved is disclosed.

The Role of the SEC

As stated in the SEC mission statement, “The mission of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is to protect investors, maintain fair, orderly, and efficient markets, and facilitate capital formation.” Congress created the SEC in 1934 as the first federal regulator of securities markets following the stock market crash of 1929, when it became clear that many companies had provided false or misleading information about their performance and prospects to investors. Since then, the SEC’s primary functions have been verifying statements from corporations and ensuring that securities institutions (like brokers, dealers, and exchanges) treat investors fairly and honestly.

What is a Security?

To determine if an offering is a security, the SEC employs the Howey Test, which classifies an offering as security if it meets all four of the following conditions:

1)It is an investment of money

2)There is an expectation of profits from the investment

3)The investment of money is in a collective enterprise

4)Any profit comes from the efforts of a promoter or third party

Since being included in 1946, the Howey Test has been the default assessment for determining if an offering is a security, and there have been few exceptions made.

Securities Requirements

As explained by FindLaw, “The Securities Act and Securities Exchange Act have broad definitions of the term security. Under these Acts, a security includes many familiar investment instruments such as notes, stocks, bonds, and investment contracts.” Whether or not an investment is a security is important because securities are subject to meeting regulatory requirements. All securities must be registered with the SEC, with few exceptions. Along with registering with the SEC, a company offering securities must disclose:

1)A description of the company’s properties and business purpose

2)A description of the security being offered

3)Information about the company’s management

4)Financial statements about the company, certified by independent accountants

The requirements are in place to ensure that investors receive accurate information and that management teams enforce proper governance. Failure to register with the SEC and comply with securities requirements leads to legal action.
Are Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) Securities?

Almost all ICOs are security offerings, at least as the laws are written currently. As explained by Kirk, Caiazza, and Rosenblum from WSGR, “There apparently has been significant shock and surprise over recent reports that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued a large number of subpoenas to initial coin offering (ICO) issuers and to ICO gatekeepers who may have been involved in token transactions that potentially did not comply with the federal securities laws. To a large extent, this shock and surprise is shocking and surprising. The SEC has been as clear as it knows how to be that it believes virtually all tokens (and simple agreements for future tokens, or SAFTs) are securities for purposes of the federal securities laws.” Of the major law firms that have issued opinions in the space, WSGR is considered to be amongst the more conservative and traditional. However, as the laws are written and how they have been historically interpreted, this must be regarded as correct. Many ICOs do pass the Howey Test because they “represent an investment of money in a common enterprise with an expectation of profits coming from the work or influence of a third party.”

Implications for Past and Future ICOs

For ICOs that have already been issued, the group from WSGR offers the following advice: “Fix the problem before the SEC fixes it for you. If you have sold tokens to unaccredited investors, or if you have otherwise not complied with the federal securities laws, strongly consider fixing the problem before the SEC finds you. Potential approaches include making a rescission offer, forking or burning certain tokens, and self-reporting to the SEC. All of these are unpalatable, to be sure. Having the SEC show up at your doorstep likely will be even more unpalatable, especially if you have not taken steps to address known securities law violations.” This will be very difficult for past projects that have issued a significant number of tokens that have gone on to trade on exchanges. If this is what is needed, it is likely the case that projects can make the best effort but not truly remedy the problem.
It is to be seen what the outcome of the subpoenas issued by the SEC to ICOs will be. This week (March 14th & 15th, 2018), the House Financial Services Committee has been holding hearings with members of the cryptocurrency industry to better understand regulatory concerns. From the regulatory perspective, the most significant concerns have been related to how cryptocurrencies may enable money laundering and the funding of terrorist groups through near-anonymous transmission of funds.

In the same, the group from WSGR concludes with a slightly optimistic outlook for the potential to adapt current laws to accommodate cryptocurrencies: “In the short term, ICO issuers and their legal counsel can work with the SEC to attempt to tailor existing registration, reporting, trading, and exchange rules to better reflect the nature of tokens and token platforms. In the longer term, the crypto industry perhaps can work with the SEC, other regulators, and Congress to develop a modified registration, reporting, and trading system that is designed specifically for the cryptocurrency.” This process of collaboration with industry has been ongoing and the hearings this week may lead to positive regulatory developments that allow innovation to take place while preventing investors from being defrauded.

2018   2018   ICO Regulations   ICO Risks   ICO Scams   Regulations

ICO Regulations: Asia

Asian market of emerging ICO start-ups had always been one of the most popular and lucrative ones. The market volumes in these countries rise constantly. Let’s consider the current governmental position on ICO in main countries of the Asian region.

1)China

Last year had seen the pressure on ICO market tightening as many major regulators including China had decided to take ultimate steps regarding the use of this economic model. Nonetheless, the ground behind such serious actions had been present – as the major checking’s had shown the fraudulent nature of the most digital start-ups.

An official document issued by the People’s Bank of China had indicated the number of 90% of start-ups being present as a scam. As a result, the

decision was to ban all the ICOs from China, either targeting domestic or an international market.

As a result, the world’s largest token sale market had been taken out of the picture. Moreover, the special directive statement had ordered all the Chinese companies not only to stop any ongoing and future projects, but also to fully return funds to their investors. These events led to Bitcoin and Ethereum market crash on 11 and 16 percent respectively, as the announcement went worldwide.

2)Hong-Kong

The regulators in this autonomy, presented by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), had been less straightforward. Instead of simple and total ICO ban, a certain set of rules for the ICO launching companies and entrepreneurs had been issued.

The approach taken by the SFC had been the following: ICO start-ups tokens could be considered as securities and had to comply with the Hong-Kong securities law. As a result, the ICOs are viewed as the activities regulated by the law and the teams launching them hold full legal responsibility. No matter which location these start-ups are registered in, the companies that are participating in such ventures must obtain specific licenses and to register in the SFC.

The legal statement indicated that tokens as an investment instruments should be considered depending on liability options, which are: the debt instrument use; corporate rights and property provision, collective investment scheme for token shares.

Summing that up, the current ICO market state in Hong-Kong could be considered quite liberal.

3)Japan

At the moment, the cryptocurrency market in Japan is the largest in the world – the country holds nearly 35% of the global volume of bitcoin trading according to the cryptocompare.com data. This is facilitated by various factors – the loyalty of the government of the country to new technologies and Bitcoin as well as the lack of a legislative framework for the direct ICO regulation.

Japan is one of the leading countries in terms of technology, and digital currencies are no exception – this country was one of the first to legalize cryptocurrencies, which occurred on April 1, 2017.

as means of payment for individuals and companies. The country controls approximately 65% of the world Bitcoin market at the moment and leads in the number of legal cryptocurrency exchanges.

Nevertheless, there are certain difficulties that prevent Japan from becoming a place of pilgrimage for ICO companies. For example, in order to conduct the business, the company must pay a license and to keep a reserve of funds in the amount of at least $100,000 and be ready for regular audits. Any incomes from cryptocurrency operations are taxed the same as Fiat profit.

At the moment, there is no legislative framework for the direct regulation of ICO in Japan, but the “law on virtual currencies” has been adopted recently. This law defines the legal status of how to attract investments in Japan – in particular, according to this collection of regulations, any company that is going to conduct Initial Coin Offering and issue its own digital currency, must be officially registered.

According to the latest Pony JFSA information, at the end of December 2017 the Bitocean Corporation specializing exclusively in bitcoin Toras. At the moment, she was 16 at the expense of officially sanctioned Burj in Japan, right – of pollute applicants over the past year. This bra since 2013 works in China and Japan, is engaged in the development of a trading platform and bitcoin Bank for operations on the period of cryptocurrency in Fiat funds.

In 2017 the Japanese finance regulator issued 15 rights totally – 11 at the end of September for the following exchanges: Money Partners, Quoine, Bitflyer, Bit Bank, SBI Virtual Currencies, GMO Coin, Bittrade, Btcbox, Bitpoint, Fisco Virtual Currency, и Zaif., and another 4 – in December 2017:Tokyo Bitcoin exchange, a bit of Arg stock Exchange, Tokyo, FTT corporations and Xtheta Corporation.

Another interesting point- it is curious that until recently, the FSA has never disclosed the names of companies that provided a legality application and are under review. The financial published a list of 32 exchanges on February 1, which are currently the object of attention of this organization, and it also includes 16 cryptoexchanges that have not yet obtained the license.

In addition to the above 16 exchanges currently working, another 16 are not currently licensed, but classified as “considered the Virtual value traders”, while their analytical FSA is being conducted, the Agency explained. Among them is Coincheck, one of the largest cryptocurrency exchanges in the country. Interestingly, at the same time, the application of the second crispy pans of crypto currency exchange Coincheck, which had water in the FSA in mid-September are still under consideration by the regulator.

Another 15 are: Minnano Bitcoin, Payward Japan, Lemuria Bitcoin Exchange (Bitcrements), Campfire Corporation, Tokyo Gateway, Lastroots Corporation, Debit, Eternal Link, FSHO Corporation, Kirin Corporation, Bit Station, Blue Dream Japan, Mr. Exchange, Bmex Corporation and Bitexpress Corporation.

The Agency published this list in response to the recent hacking of Coincheck, Japan’s largest cryptocurrency exchange at the moment. On Friday, January 26, the Coincheck platform announced the theft of 58 billion yen ($533 million) in NEM crypto currency (XEM). Even earlier, Coincheck suspended operations with NEM and other altcoins, after more than 100 million XRP tokens had been withdrawn from the company’s wallet in an unknown direction (about $123.5 million at the rate).

At the same time, although the exchange promises to repay the debts of its 260,000 affected clients from the company’s wallet, no timeframe for payments has yet been established. In addition, the FSA has ordered to conduct internal audits of all other cryptocurrency exchanges in Japan on the basis of a checklist of 43 items, according to Jiji Press. They must report on their risk management systems, such as the details of their systems for asset management clients and offer countermeasures cyber-attack prevention.

According to Reuters, the FSA ordered Coincheck to submit an “ incident report and measures to prevent recurrence” by February 13, 2018. In addition, the Agency can “conduct on-site inspections of other exchanges», the press service said. In addition, the Tokyo police Department will soon investigate the stock exchange hack.

At the moment, the government of Japan is not likely going to ban the ICO. Nevertheless, it is planned to create a legislative framework for regulation, the main priorities of which will be the fight against fraudulent projects and the protection of investors ’ funds, the inability to launder money during the ICO, as well as the creation of a set of rules for processing cryptocurrency transactions.

JFSA also issued a statement about the risks of investing in the ICO for the citizens of the country from 27/10/2017.It follows the trend of tightening ICO regulation by the governments of the Asian region countries.

In a statement, the Japanese FSA warns the citizens of the country about the possible risks of a sharp decline in token prices, as well as the risks of potential fraud conducted by the ICO companies: the opportunities of the token described in the White Paper projects may not be planned for implementation at all, and goods and services may not be intended to be provided for the platform tokens.

The financial regulator also reported that the ICO could fall under the law on payment services on securities market and stock exchange legislation depending on the legal registration of the ICO. In this case, the organizing companies of the ICO must comply with the requirements of a specific law, including mandatory registration.

In addition, the regular provision of services related to the exchange of cryptocurrencies will require a separate registration with the local financial Bureau. JFSA also specifically noted that carrying out these activities without registration is a crime in Japan.

To sum up, on the one hand, the JFSA and the authorities of the country encourage the production and use of cryptocurrencies, including through the adoption of a special law that enshrines the regime of virtual currencies as a monetary value used in the performance of obligations.

On the other hand, not all the tokens are cryptocurrency at large, and not all the token functions are limited to the means of exchange. That’s why the JFSA position is rather guided on the elimination of uncertainty than tighter ICO regulation.

These points, as well as all the above laws are included in the official document of the Japanese Blockchain Union of November 18, 2017 – ‘guide to ICO sale marker for residents of Japan.’

Koji Higashi, the co-founder of the digital token wallet IndieSquare and a very prominent figure on the Japanese cryptocurrency scene, believes that despite recent steps, there is still uncertainty about the country’s position regarding the ICO. Contrary to popular belief, many industries Japan is not risk-averse and conservative, and he believes that the suppression of the new amount of cryptocoins JFSA is still ‘certainly possible.’

‘Japan, in fact, is not very friendly to the ICO. Regulators are simply more loyal than in other countries. They are trying to find out whether it will be good or bad,’ he said during a visit to Seoul”. This does not mean that the JFSA will not begin to regulate the ICO more actively in the future when serious problems begin to arise.”

However, while the issue of ICO regulation is in limbo, some Japanese companies take advantage of the model. For example, at the end of November 2017, the administration of the village of Nishiavakura distinguished itself, which thanks to ICO successfully raised money for the revival of the economy in the region.

The recent events in Japan shows that the country will not become a new Mecca for the ICO campaigns in a short run as the latest trends, including a tightening of the rules JFSA hacking exchange Coincheck, an additional review of the exchanges does not improve the investment climate of the country.

4)South Korea

The country regulator called the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) had taken the cardinal approach to the ICO emerging market. While nearly two million people trading digital assets, South Korea is considered the world’s third-largest cryptocurrency market accounting for some 15% of daily global trade volume. Many analysts believe the unusual popularity of cryptocurrency in South Korea may be attributable to a unique mixture of geopolitical and cultural factors.

The digital currency meeting in Seoul had seen the declaration of the full ban of the all forms of virtual currencies fundraising. The reasons behind this had been clarified quite simple – the investors safety as the legal examination had revealed the unprecedented number SCAM projects. This event had put many in despair as before the controversial decision, the South Korean market had been viewed alongside Japan as one of the most favorable for an overall crypto industry development and ICO start-ups launch.

5)Singapore

Speaking about the best directions for ICO market development, this city-state is definitely aimed to become the most attractive one.

Certain factors could explain this phenomenon, though the main things is a government attitude as it results in convenient taxation rules and the government funding of the best digital start-ups.

Back In August 2017, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) issued its first guidance note on ICOs that stated “the function of digital tokens has evolved beyond just being a virtual currency” to the point that some coins “may represent ownership or a security interest over an issuer’s assets or property.”

In result, sellers of tokens with these characteristics are required to register a prospectus with MAS prior to their ICO. Along with secondary market operators set to trade the tokens, these sellers are also subject to Singaporean licensing requirements for securities vendors and need regulatory approval from MAS. This closely follows the line adopted by the US Securities & Exchange Commission.

In regard to ICOs, the Authority wishes to hold the Singapore reputation as a financial center and at the same to prevent money laundering. Already in August MAS claimed that tokens of certain ICO projects may be subject to the Securities and Futures Authority regulations. The stance was shared right after the similar announcement by the US SEC: tokens will be considered as securities depending on the context of their issue.

After revealing its position on tokens, together with the Consumer Advisory on Investment Schemes of Singapore Police Force, MAC has issued the statement on potential risks of digital token and virtual currency-related investment schemes. Among the factors to consider are the incorporation within Singapore territory, credible and reliable information on the issuer and token sales, and token liquidity
guarantees on the secondary markets. Moreover, investors should be worried in case the rocketing returns are promised or there are grounds to suspect criminal money laundering.

The authority is certain that not the restrictions but the right regulations will be a magic pill that will cure the ICO market. With relevant regulations investors will be protected by law and more people will be able to participate in ICO projects. MAS advised investors to mitigate risks when possible and in case of questions, do not hesitate to turn to MAS for assistance and clarifications. The authority promised to provide full information on the ICO projects, which have presence in Singapore.

6)Malaysia

Speaking about this country, the beginning of September 2017, the Securities Commission Malaysia has also published the press release warning ICO investors. The commission warned the companies that potentially the initial coin offerings could be a subject to securities regulations. As many others, the Malaysian regulator warned also the investors “to be mindful of the potential risks involved in ICO schemes”, resulted, in particular, from secondary market high price volatility and lack of legal protection for investors. The statement concludes “as the terms and features of ICO schemes may differ in each case, investors who wish to engage or invest in ICO schemes are reminded to seek legal or other professional advice if there are doubts on the legitimacy of these schemes”.

It is worth noticing, that in its statement the Malaysian regulator remains neutral towards ICO itself. There are no directions in regards to fees or any other methods for crime suppression.

7)Taiwan

At the beginning of October 2017, Taiwan’s Financial Supervisory Commission chairman Wellington Koo has told during a joint session that Taiwan government intended to support the development and adoption of initial coin offerings and acknowledge blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies as lawful. Koo stated that Taiwan government is not planning to ban the blockchain and crypto-related activities. Moreover, the innovative startups were promised a government comprehensive support.

The legislator Jason HSU, a congressman from Taiwan’s Nationalist party, which has long adopted a deregulatory pro-FinTech stance, stated during the session:

“Just because China and South Korea are banning, doesn’t mean that Taiwan should follow suit – there is a huge opportunity for growth in the future. We should emulate Japan, where they treat cryptocurrency as a highly regulated, highly monitored industry like securities.”

8)Thailand

Thailand Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued its stance on ICO in the middle of September. With the development and growing popularity of ICO, the Thailand SEC has developed a concern that “in some cases, ICO may be deliberately used as a tool for fraud and scam”.The statement wording suggests that Thai regulator is striving to find the balance between protecting the investors and supporting digital innovations. The commission viewpoint is in many ways similar to Hong-Kong, Japan, and the US SEC stances:

“Since the digital tokens can diverge widely in design and representation, some may resemble financial returns, rights and obligations in similar ways to securities under the Securities and Exchange Act”.

As a final statement, the agency accentuated that the control over ICO market is the only way to gain the best value from the promising blockchain market, the development of which the Thai government does not plan to suppress in forthcoming future.

2018   2018   Crypto conferences   Crypto industry   ICO   ICO Regulations   ICO Risks   Regulations

Why so serious? The reasons behind governments worldwide ICO regulations

As more and more entrepreneurs do engage in worldwide ICO boom, the more extensive growth the popularity, which, of course, increase the governmental suspiciousness and alert level. As Initial Coin Offering model itself present a new way of attracting investments, which has been free of any legal rules at first place, the needed measures were to be taken in order to establish control.
Instead of shares in traditional IPO financial model, an ICO investor receives project tokens, that may one day present certain substantial value. The unmatched liberty of this market in recent years had caused the incredible rise in start-ups numbers, which had moved beyond the 1,500 figures as for Q2 2018.

Of course, such major market increase had attracted not only the initiative and smart entrepreneurs but the ones willing to succeed on the overall worldwide hype. The fraudsters’ actions on the creation of ICO bubbles and Ponzi schemes caused the rise of so-called scam project to the level of 90% by the end of the 2017 year, and in 2018 the situation ain’t much better.

As for Q2 2018, the total amount of funds attracted using the ICO model stands at more than $3 Billion which indicates a steady market growth – for example; this number had risen from $26 million in 2014 to $225 million in 2016 and to $5,4 Billion in 2017. That undoubtedly high number still doesn’t include some significant future projects as Telegram’s planned $1 Billion ICO, or Overstock’s ICO and fewer perspective ones, so this year will undoubtedly show new record heights.
Bold statistics show a visible increase in specific segments of business – Internet of Things and People, Financial Markets, Investments, Banking & Payments and Cryptocurrency sectors are the most popular in the current state of market.
In total, there are 225 crypto funds across seven strategy types and see assets in the space being between $3.5 billion and $5 billion.
More and more individuals and private companies became to recognize the convenience and perceptiveness of fundraising possibility of ICO.

The absolute absence of investment regulations and attractiveness of certain opportunities went hand to hand with no safeguard options for investors. The project documentation most of the time went on describing the promises in a white paper to solve the specific issue using the Blockchain as the most innovative and influential tool, and these promises quite often proved to be empty. However, holding them to those promises have not always worked.

At such circumstances, the political moves directed on ICO market were the matter of time. There are a lot of reason behind specific rules applied by different countries, so specific main reasons behind specific strict rules are worth mentioning below:

1)Fraud activities/SCAM project level rise

The percentage of scam project within the ICO fundraising models’ boundaries had risen drastically. For example, In June 2017, only 7% of total projects failed or turned out to be a scam, while in August-September this number had risen to 54%, and to 67% later in the following month. Financial reports indicated the rise up of SCAM-level up to 90% as of late 2017 and early 2018.

2)Pyramid/Ponzi schemes

The creation of more complex ventures explicitly made with one aim – to lure the investors’ money, had become a reality in ICO market quite a long time ago.
We can remember the infamous One Coin project – an actually MLM Ponzi scheme exposed worldwide. This project turned out to be much more sinister and ambitious as well as long-playing. Truth be told, the well known now Ponzi scheme of the OneCoin project should have met its demise many years ago. The amount of evidence contributing to One Coin’s status as a pyramid scheme is much more than considerable – its directors have previously been involved in other known scam operations, its resources contain no verifiable evidence for any of its business claims and documentation uploaded to support claims often conflicts with the claims themselves. Certain steps have been made by the many countries’ governmental organizations to put this project under the legal heat and stop it forever.

3) Fever ICO market nature

Some financial analysts had come up with the idea that the ICO market has specific indicators of a gold-rush feverish mentality, which harms both individual investors that follow the crypto market hype trends and both the companies.

4) Funding the terror organization cells

The absence of regulative and overwatch tools raised talks about the real danger of ICO model being used to support different worldwide terrorist groups and large organization even, although confirmations are hard to prove.

5) Manipulation

The United States SEC commission made the official statement alerting the public community that many companies can use the so-called “pump-and-dump” schemes with the goal to influence and fluctuate the market indicators and prices.

6) Money laundering

Last, but not the least point of justifiable governmental anxiety, is that the ICO model structure makes it perfect use for the good old way of money laundering.

Anyway, as ICOs itself present quite a new world phenomenon, regulators are about to formulate and create the new rules of tackling the incoming issues – in fact, most of the strict rules or official public statements had been done quite recently.
The legal base development is quite a time-consuming process as many governments try not to react on first notice but research the impact of the ICO on their economy as well as the country developments and effect causing ICO popularity growth on its citizens.

2018   2018   Blockchain   Crypto industry   Digital investmens   ICO   ICO Risks   ICO Scams   Regulations